Title Contenders

Title contenders

In their smear campain it is the iaugeral fact that they are in the supremeship of their time but they cannot confiscate the thought that they are Immanuel like a phrophet.In the fact that they are there in the fact that it  is that they are incorperated in the ANC.It will be their exposure to the fact that they are in so small a matter of fact to the Gupta fact.That they're in the with all in the sense of humour in this party.

In their policy making it is the policy demand that is required in the place that they are in.In the consequint fact that theyre there and are more in the declineing state of the hear fact  and that they are disliked.In the state of no remittence of it is their fact that they are there in the so fact of it and is their upseen fact.That they are reprieved in the state that theyre in.is the states statement.It is the fact that they are in the more sincere fact then there are counterparts and the leaders in the world.In the consequince to the fact it is their show.Their is no remittence in the sense that theyre not there.In the so fact it is there that they are abhored in the circles that they form.For Nkosasana Dlamini-Zuma it is more than  a near race than an election unit that consits mainly of arbitrtion laws that are consistent.Her impetual style in leadership counts for accountabillety.It is the fact that her name is Zuma.It is the constant change in her name that is in fawsted in the sense that she has a leadership sense.AU recognition might give her the ANC patronage but in the believingm of it that she will become one of the biggst leades in the ANC.In the EU she is understandebly so in the market but not in the might mark.But in Africa she is recodnised in the sense of her pride that is instituted in them  that  is good.For them that she is in the medium of the small fry now is a statement ocular sense but she is in with the big wigs now.Her counterpart is the more substantive one that is the oneness of mind of them.She is the primi-one in the counterpart assecories.He is the talking one in the seaming sense that he is not forgiving in the sense that they are more in the sense that they are in.In the silky wood side he is more of the primitive in like side of things.He ism the moneys worth in this candicy in the stature of things in the mind of it all in the republic.In the scene of do or die he is more real in her modest approach.It is the so small that has affected him in the case of Zuma vs Gupta that willprobably ply it out in this instance.That is the radical sense of it all that he is seen in the modest effect of the things that he is in.But in the sense that he is in he could be more averse than traverse in the sense that they are all likely to succeed.For us it would be like human capitilisation in the scene of righteuos manhood.that is prabable.